Paint & Coatings Industry
  Home
  Subscribe to NFT L!VE
  Subscribe
  NFT L!VE
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Breaking News
  Web Exclusives
  Green Products Pavilion
  Green Matters
  Calendar
  Product of the Week
  Floor Tour Blog
  Flooring Insider.com
  Career Center
  Webinars
  Current
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Resources
  Archives
  eNewsletter Archive
  Trade Directory + Buyers Guide
  Wood Flooring Guide
  Radiant Flooring Guide
  Digital Radiant Flooring Guide
  Classifieds
  AEC Store
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Product Info (FREE)
  NFT Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
NWFA, FCICA endorse statement on floor flatness

February 22, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Two national flooring associations, the National Wood Flooring Association (NWFA) and the Flooring Contractors Association (FCICA) have endorsed a position statement on floor flatness tolerances written by the American Society of Concrete Contractors (ASCC).  Members of both associations will use the document to help resolve this ongoing construction issue.

The statement explains that flooring contractors (Division 9) and concrete contractors (Division 3) measure floor flatness by different means.  In addition, floor flatness changes with time, due to a process called curling.  Curling makes it impossible to predict what the flatness of a slab will be when the floor coverings are installed.  

The solution to this, the associations agree, is for the owner to provide a bid allowance, established by the designer and based on the floor covering requirements, for grinding and patching necessary to close the gap between Division 3 tolerances and Division 9 tolerances.

“The difference between how Division 3 and Division 9 measure floor flatness, and the changes that occur in a concrete slab between pouring and the time the floor covering is applied, have been the source of many arguments, much misspent time and numerous lawsuits,” says Paul Albanelli, president of ASCC.

“For the first time, instead of disagreeing, the two sides have come together to find a common solution to a problem that has cost both sides hundreds of thousands of dollars in rework,” adds Edward Korczak, executive director/CEO of NWFA.

“We believe an allowance in the bid would accomplish two things,” says Ward Malisch, technical director of ASCC.  “First, it would cover the cost of the patching and grinding that is almost always required.  Second, it brings the issue to the attention of the owner and designer early on, hopefully forcing them to acknowledge that the point in question does in fact exist.”

“Many members of the ASCC have successfully used this Position Statement to drive home this point with owners,” says Albanelli.  “We believe a joint statement from Division 3 and Division 9 contractors will carry even more weight.  The intent of all three organizations is that it will be used to make the construction process go more smoothly for all involved.”

The Position Statement may be read online at www.ascconline.org  To purchase a copy call (866) 788-2722.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media